Corporate

78 | 330-BUD-01-IMOT 10. Culture: Performance Evaluation Develop guideline for evaluators, explaining potential consequences of ineffective evaluation, frequency (not just an annual activity) Develop resource for conducting regular review of leading and lagging indicators, clarity on what is measured and what targets are to be achieved, continuous improvement Develop training on effective communication between supervisors and workers Clarification of performance outcomes, compared to why these targets are important to the organization Alignment of goals across all lines within the organization, in harmony with each other

• Slide Number 1
• Disclaimer
• Table of Contents
• RA RCA project overview
• Introduction
• Industry Selection
• A Collaborative Approach
• Risk Assessment Workshop
• WSPS Communications – Risk Assessment Results
• RCA workshop Results
• Risk Statement
• Participant List: Subject Matter Experts
• RCA Results
• Identified Primary Causal Factors
• Category Breakdown – 25 Primary Causal Factors
• Voting Process – Level of Importance
• Top 10 Primary Causal Factors
• Employer vs. Workshop Results
• Worker vs. Workshop Results
• Employer vs. Worker Results
• Top 10 Comparison
• Recommendations
• Top Workshop Recommendations
• Next steps – Rca workshop
• RCA Infographic
• Next Steps
• Slide Number 27
• Appendix A – Fishbone diagrams
• Primary Causal Factors
• Overall Fishbone
• Slide Number 31
• Slide Number 32
• Slide Number 33
• Slide Number 34
• Slide Number 35
• Slide Number 36
• Appendix B – Controls/Solutions for top primary causal factors
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (1)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (2)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (3)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (4)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (5)
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment (1)
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment (2)
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment (3)
• 3. Process: Lack of/Inadequate Documented Program
• 3. Process: Lack of/Inadequate Documented Program (1)
• 3. Process: Lack of/Inadequate Documented Program (2)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (1)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (2)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (3)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (4)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (5)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (6)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (1)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (2)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (3)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (4)
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts (1)
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts (2)
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts (3)
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment (1)
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment (2)
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment (3)
• 8. Process: Lack of Monitoring
• 8. Process: Lack of Monitoring (1)
• 8. Process: Lack of Monitoring (2)
• 9. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Maintenance
• 9. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Maintenance (1)
• 9. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Maintenance (2)
• 10. Culture: Performance Evaluation
• 10. Culture: Performance Evaluation (1)
• 10. Culture: Performance Evaluation (2)
• Top 5 Immediate Actions (System)
• Appendix c – workshop contacts
• Workshop Contacts
• Slide Number 83