Corporate

64 | 330-BUD-01-IMOT 6. People: Taking Shortcuts Develop resource to review lock locations, access and proximity within a facility, provide best practice to discourage shortcuts Design audible alerts on panels or equipment announcing that locks are required before proceeding, consider automating or designing into the equipment (similar to seat belt alerts in vehicles) – As an example: a lock with an RFID, which communicates with a program to confirm it's been applied Develop resources to help personalize and emphasize the consequences of taking shortcuts; e.g. write a letter to a family member explaining why they didn't come home; or place a picture of a loved one on a lock Develop resources to link workplace safety to public safety, off the job Direct a portion of MLITSD fines to support public safety initiatives

• Slide Number 1
• Disclaimer
• Table of Contents
• RA RCA project overview
• Introduction
• Industry Selection
• A Collaborative Approach
• Risk Assessment Workshop
• WSPS Communications – Risk Assessment Results
• RCA workshop Results
• Risk Statement
• Participant List: Subject Matter Experts
• RCA Results
• Identified Primary Causal Factors
• Category Breakdown – 25 Primary Causal Factors
• Voting Process – Level of Importance
• Top 10 Primary Causal Factors
• Employer vs. Workshop Results
• Worker vs. Workshop Results
• Employer vs. Worker Results
• Top 10 Comparison
• Recommendations
• Top Workshop Recommendations
• Next steps – Rca workshop
• RCA Infographic
• Next Steps
• Slide Number 27
• Appendix A – Fishbone diagrams
• Primary Causal Factors
• Overall Fishbone
• Slide Number 31
• Slide Number 32
• Slide Number 33
• Slide Number 34
• Slide Number 35
• Slide Number 36
• Appendix B – Controls/Solutions for top primary causal factors
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (1)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (2)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (3)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (4)
• 1. Process: Inadequate Training (5)
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment (1)
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment (2)
• 2. Process: Lack of Hazard Identification/Risk Assessment (3)
• 3. Process: Lack of/Inadequate Documented Program
• 3. Process: Lack of/Inadequate Documented Program (1)
• 3. Process: Lack of/Inadequate Documented Program (2)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (1)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (2)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (3)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (4)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (5)
• 4. People: Lack of Worker Competency (6)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (1)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (2)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (3)
• 5. Culture: Accepted Work Norms (4)
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts (1)
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts (2)
• 6. People: Taking Shortcuts (3)
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment (1)
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment (2)
• 7. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Equipment (3)
• 8. Process: Lack of Monitoring
• 8. Process: Lack of Monitoring (1)
• 8. Process: Lack of Monitoring (2)
• 9. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Maintenance
• 9. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Maintenance (1)
• 9. Tools and Machines: Inadequate Maintenance (2)
• 10. Culture: Performance Evaluation
• 10. Culture: Performance Evaluation (1)
• 10. Culture: Performance Evaluation (2)
• Top 5 Immediate Actions (System)
• Appendix c – workshop contacts
• Workshop Contacts
• Slide Number 83