Corporate

Examining the impact of the HUGR AUTHENTIC CONNECTIONS

Browse through our library of WSPS policies, annual reports, strategic plans and more.

Issue link: https://www.wsps.ca/resource-hub/i/1461516

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 32 of 56

32 These results suggest no significant changes in participants' reports of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and perceived isolation over the three time points. The only exception was the Howatt Loneliness Scale that indicated a significant decrease in loneliness. Impact of the app over time (Test 1 to Test 3) Differences over time based on usage of the app were also investigated. The results of one-way ANOVA showed no significant difference among users who had no interaction, had minimal interaction, or had meaningful interaction with the app at each time point of this study. As seen in Table 7, this indicates there were no differences between participants who had no interaction, minimal interaction, or meaningful interaction with the app at Time 1 regarding their level of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and perceived isolation. There also were no differences between participants who had no interaction, minimal interaction, or meaningful interaction with the app at Time 2 or Time 3 in terms of their level of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and perceived isolation. This suggests that usage levels of the app did not impact participants' anxiety, depression, loneliness, or perceived isolation over time. Changes over time based on usage of the app were then investigated. The results indicated a significant change in loneliness measured by the Howatt Loneliness Scale among those who had no interaction with the app, suggesting the considerable overall change in loneliness was caused by external circumstances, not by app usage. There were no other significant changes over time in any of the groups' variables. The results suggest that app usage could not account for changes in the Howatt Loneliness Scale. Although these findings do not support the app's effectiveness, they are not conclusive. The sample size was not statistically sufficient nor consistent across three groups (no interaction = 26; minimal interaction = 33; meaningful interaction = 3).

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Corporate - Examining the impact of the HUGR AUTHENTIC CONNECTIONS